State v. Seagull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a warrant remained valid when police mistook a tomato plant for cannabis
• concluding officer acted reasonably when he first knocked at one door, and then after remembering from previous visit that former occupants could not hear knock at that door, walked to another door
• concluding officer acted reasonably when he first knocked at one door, and then after remembering from previous visit that former occupants could not hear knock at that door, walked to another door
• adopting Franks as \wholly logical\ because Fourth Amendment proscribes \unreasonable\ but not \inaccurate\ searches
• listing factors to determine whether the open view doctrine has been violated
• adopting Franks as “wholly logical” because Fourth Amendment proscribes “unreasonable” but not “inaccurate” searches

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).