Skip to main content

State v. Myrick

Citations

  • 688 P.2d 151
  • 102 Wash. 2d 506
  • 1984 Wash. LEXIS 1871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the contention that aircrafts generally are overly intrusive technological devices when used for surveillance purposes
  • holding aerial surveillance violated state privacy clause
  • holding aerial surveillance violated state privacy clause
  • rejecting Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 44 S.Ct. 445, 68 L.Ed. 898 (1924) and Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 104 S.Ct. 1735, 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984) and changing inquiry from defendant's expectation of privacy to protection of private affairs
  • rejecting Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 44 S. Ct. 445, 68 L. Ed. 898 (1924) and Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 104 S. Ct. 1735, 80 L. Ed. 2d 214 (1984) and changing inquiry from defendant’s expectation of privacy to protection of private affairs
  • not a search when police conducted aerial surveillance from 1,500 feet without the use of visual enhancement devices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Myrick

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.