Skip to main content
· 3/23/1960

Albert Lopez Gallego v. United States

Citations

  • 276 F.2d 914
  • 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • clarifying that testimonial evidence may be sufficient even with some gaps
  • “[w]here no evidence indicating otherwise is produced, the presumption of regularity supports the official acts of public officers and courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathews, Hamley, Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.