Skip to main content

State v. Shattuck

Citations

  • 689 N.W.2d 785
  • 2004 Minn. LEXIS 801
  • 2004 WL 2965449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requesting briefing, in part, on whether supreme court has inherent authority to authorize use of sentencing juries and bi furcated trials
  • applying Apprendi and Blakely to hold that the district court’s imposition of an upward durational departure sentence violated appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury
  • “[I]mposition of the presumptive sentence is mandatory absent additional judicial findings under the legislatively-created Guidelines regime....”
  • stayed pending decision in Shattuck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.