Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 3/8/2005
State v. Barker
Citations
- 692 N.W.2d 755
- 2005 Minn. App. LEXIS 218
- 2005 WL 527386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- also considering and rejecting argument that district court possessed statutory authority to impanel resentencing jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toussaint, Minge, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 1,506×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-09-25· cited 32×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-12-16· cited 29×
- State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-12-28· cited 19×
- State v. CongerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-10-12· cited 18×
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-12-28· cited 8×
- State v. RoysterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-02-04· cited 6×
- State v. HanfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-10-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.