Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/26/2006
State v. Chauvin
Citations
- 723 N.W.2d 20
- 2006 Minn. LEXIS 716
- 2006 WL 3026126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that a district court could empanel a sentencing jury under Blakely to comply with the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines
- determining that a district court could empanel a sentencing jury under Blakely to comply with the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines
- agreeing with precedent where we opted for narrow severance to “do the least amount of damage to the statutory scheme”
- noting that Blakely errors are subject to harmless-error analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-12· cited 68×
- State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court· 2008-04-04· cited 60×
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-08· cited 60×
- State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 59×
- State v. MaugaotegaHawaii Supreme Court· 2007-10-01· cited 51×
- State v. M.D.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-22· cited 46×
- State v. KendellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-11-09· cited 43×
- Hankerson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-26· cited 35×
- Prentis Cordell Jackson v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-03· cited 13×
- Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-28· cited 11×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-07-03· cited 11×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-07-20· cited 10×
- State v. CutsingerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-02-29· cited 8×
- State v. AdellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-09-16· cited 7×
- State v. EssexCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-11-04· cited 7×
- State v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-02-06· cited 5×
- Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-01-25· cited 5×
- State v. SaileeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-12-14· cited 5×
- State v. SpragginsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-04· cited 3×
- Back v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-09-27· cited 3×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,105×
- Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-06-27· cited 1,102×
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-01-27· cited 414×
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 183×
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 174×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-10-06· cited 124×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-08· cited 78×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-25· cited 74×
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-01· cited 73×
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-04-16· cited 68×
- In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-01-09· cited 63×
- State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-04-17· cited 55×
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-07-13· cited 50×
- State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2005-11-16· cited 46×
- Strauch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-06-18· cited 45×
- State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-11-17· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.