State v. Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “defendant’s privacy in [his or] her own home, [is] a setting in which the protections of Article I, section 9, are at their highest”
• determining that the denial of a motion to suppress was not harmless because the erroneously admitted evidence was central to the state’s case against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Parnell
  Klamath County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-11· cited 16×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-14· cited 5×
• State v. Gilliland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Lawson/James
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 143×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
• State v. Unger
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 113×
• State v. Fair
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-05-31· cited 88×
• State v. Portrey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-24· cited 39×
• State v. Dahl
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 38×
• State v. Musser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 33×
• State v. Somfleth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-21· cited 30×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-03· cited 23×
• State v. Fortmeyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 14×
• State v. Crook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-19· cited 10×