State v. Crook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for trial court to consider whether suppression of out-of-court identification also required suppression of in-court identification where defendant’s motion to suppress had “requested suppression of any in-court identification”
• evidence of stolen property observed through open car window was admissible as plain view observation
• illegal search of vehicle and seizure of picture used to identify defendant should have been suppressed
• evidence in plain view is admissible and is not a product of illegal search
• where police arrested the defendant in her home and seized her car keys, subsequent warrantless search of the defendant's car, which was parked 100 feet from her residence, did not fit within the automobile exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cromwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 20×
• State v. Snow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 7×
• In re the Marriage of Batt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-10· cited 7×
• State v. Harris
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-09-08· cited 3×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-23· cited 3×
• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 1×
• State v. Hickey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-01
• State v. Peters
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 91×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-03-24· cited 25×
• State v. Belcher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 16×
• State v. Tremaine
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-03-08· cited 7×