Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/3/2014

State v. Miller

Citations

267 Or. App. 382
340 P.3d 740
2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

officer unlawfully prolonged traffic stop by deploying drug dog because he lacked reasonable suspicion of drug possession
reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence did not support deployment of drug dog which detects the presence of drugs, not whether a person is intoxicated
reasonable suspicion that 5 defendant was driving under the influence did not support deployment of drug dog which detects the presence of drugs, not whether a person is intoxicated
“We review the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress for legal error.”
“Whenever the state has obtained evidence fol- lowing the violation of a defendant’s Article I, section 9, rights, it is presumed that the evidence was tainted by the violation and must be suppressed.”
“We review the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress for legal error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.