Arizona Supreme Court· 12/22/1994
State v. Ross
Citations
- 886 P.2d 1354
- 180 Ariz. 598
- 180 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s challenge to execution by lethal gas as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment was rendered moot by statutory change permitting option of execution by lethal injection
- \A murder is senseless when it is unnecessary to allow the defendant to complete his objective.\
- where defendant states witness elimination is motive for murder; where murder victim is witness to other crime and is killed to prevent that person from testifying; where extraordinary circumstances exist
- “A murder is senseless when it is unnecessary to allow the defendant to complete his objective.”
- finding only one example of third category in prior cases
- finding victim helpless after the first gunshot disabled him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martone, Feldman, Moeller, Corcoran, Zlaket
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 376×
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 304×
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 187×
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-19· cited 182×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 167×
- State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court· 1998-10-20· cited 158×
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 154×
- Smith v. StewartNinth Circuit· 1998-04-07· cited 128×
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court· 2007-06-13· cited 103×
- Robinson v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 103×
- State v. MarshSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 96×
- State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 94×
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 94×
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 92×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-26· cited 92×
- State v. StokleyArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 91×
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court· 2012-07-10· cited 89×
- David Ramirez v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2019-09-11· cited 84×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- Richmond v. LewisSupreme Court· 1992-12-01· cited 349×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
- Hydroculture, Inc. v. CoopersSupreme Court· 1983-11-14· cited 199×
- State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-28· cited 157×
- State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 139×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 136×
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 129×
- State v. FierroaArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-18· cited 105×
- State v. ComerArizona Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 104×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1985-09-10· cited 98×
- State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 96×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-12· cited 95×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.