State v. Probst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in considering a collateral challenge to a final conviction, a presumption of regularity attaches that shifts the burden of persuasion to the person challenging the conviction
• holding that, in considering a collateral challenge to a final conviction, a presumption 672 Pereida-Alba v. Coursey of regularity attaches that shifts the burden of persuasion to the person challenging the conviction
• holding that, in considering a collateral challenge to a final conviction, a presumption 672 Pereida-Alba v. Coursey of regularity attaches that shifts the burden of persuasion to the person challenging the conviction
• stating that judgments are “entitled to a presumption of validity”
• case remanded to trial court for defendant to put on evidence establishing that absence of counsel resulted in involuntary guilty plea
• col- lecting cases in which courts “adopted the presumption of regularity for prior convictions used to enhance sentences or as elements of a crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).