Oregon Supreme Court· 12/28/2007
State v. Wheeler
Citations
- 175 P.3d 438
- 343 Or. 652
- 2007 Ore. LEXIS 1231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that presumptive life sentence imposed pursuant to ORS 137.719(1) is facially constitutional under Article I, section 16
- explaining that the standard for displacing a legislatively prescribed sentence under Article I, section 16, is one “that would find a penalty to be disproportionately severe for a particular offense only in rare circumstances”
- applying “shock the moral sense” standard to claim that sentence was not proportioned to the offense
- the Supreme Court “consistently has adhered to the view that it is the province of the leg- islature to establish the penalties for the violations of the various criminal statutes” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Balmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ClemonsIllinois Supreme Court· 2012-04-19· cited 213×
- State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
- State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 56×
- State v. AlthouseOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 39×
- State v. AlwingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-14· cited 26×
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-27· cited 20×
- State v. BartolOregon Supreme Court· 2021-10-07· cited 20×
- State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court· 2016-09-22· cited 19×
- State v. WieseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 14×
- State v. Carey-MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-06· cited 14×
- State v. Camacho-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 14×
- Jewell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-11-30· cited 13×
- State v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-02· cited 13×
- State v. Parra-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 13×
- Real v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-04· cited 12×
- State v. LeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-19· cited 10×
- David Michael NorgaardWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-12-09· cited 9×
- State v. SokellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-16· cited 9×
- State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-25· cited 8×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-09· cited 7×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,555×
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 177×
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-21· cited 171×
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-05-10· cited 156×
- State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-23· cited 108×
- Cannon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1955-03-23· cited 98×
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 88×
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 79×
- State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court· 1909-07-14· cited 77×
- State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court· 2005-09-29· cited 69×
- State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court· 1958-05-14· cited 67×
- Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 54×
- State v. Ferman-VelascoOregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-28· cited 52×
- Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court· 1921-10-25· cited 52×
- Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 39×
- Tuel v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1963-03-20· cited 38×
- Jensen v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1962-06-13· cited 34×
- Taylor v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-21· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.