Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/14/2009

State v. Marquez

Citations

967 A.2d 56
291 Conn. 122
2009 Conn. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding scientific literature “is far from universal or even well established” and that “research is in great flux”
noting lack of “real-world data” in certain research areas (citation omitted)
“[a] procedure is unfair which suggests in advance of identification by the witness the identity of the person suspected by the police” [internal quotation marks omitted]
procedure is unnecessarily suggestive when “variations in array photographs . . . highlight [the] defendant to [the] point that it affects [the] witness’ selection” [emphasis added]
until scientific research produces more definitive answers, due process does not require suppression of photographic identification that is not the product of a double-blind sequential procedure
until scientific research produces more definitive answers, due process does not require suppression of photographic identification that is not the product of a I l 1 double-blind sequential procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.