Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/7/2009
State v. Tabone
Citations
- 973 A.2d 74
- 292 Conn. 417
- 2009 Conn. LEXIS 201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “claims of double jeopardy involving multiple punishments present a question of law to which we afford plenary review”
- if defen- dant violates probation on final day of probationary period ‘‘he would be exposed to the full suspended sentence of . . . incarceration’’
- addressing issue likely to arise on remand
- addressing issue likely to arise on remand
- addressing issue likely to arise on remand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott, Katz, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Schaller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-16· cited 72×
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-06· cited 29×
- State v. NATHAN J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-01· cited 17×
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-04· cited 15×
- Commissioner of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-06-28· cited 12×
- Kupersmith v. KupersmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-09-24· cited 12×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-17· cited 8×
- State v. ReddyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-04-24· cited 6×
- State v. BattleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-08-27· cited 5×
- State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-26· cited 3×
- State v. BERNACKIConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-06· cited 3×
- Town of Canton v. Cadle Properties of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-09-10· cited 2×
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-05-25· cited 1×
- Stanford v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-05
- MSO, LLC v. DeSimoneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-08-12
- Casiano v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-06-09
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-09-29
- State v. Victor O.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-01-19
- State v. Jason B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-01-19
- State v. KelleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-29
Cites
69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
- Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-03-05· cited 243×
- Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court· 1985-11-12· cited 153×
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-25· cited 152×
- Doe v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 133×
- Del Rosario v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 128×
- King v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1938-05-16· cited 127×
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-05· cited 126×
- Robinson v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1944-07-31· cited 95×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-16· cited 91×
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-12-11· cited 90×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-13· cited 88×
- State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-20· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.