Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/8/2010

In Re Tayler F.

Citations

995 A.2d 611
296 Conn. 524
2010 Conn. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying plenary review to question of whether trial court applied proper standard and procedures in making discretionary determination
creating special proce- dures for hearsay testimony of child witnesses pursuant to which trial court properly may conclude that child is unavailable if there is competent evidence that child will suffer psychological harm from testifying
right to confrontation and cross-examination in civil action grounded in due process clauses of fifth and fourteenth amendments
right to confrontation and cross-examination in civil action is grounded in due process clauses of fifth and fourteenth amendments
“[W]e conclude that a trial court properly may conclude that a child is unavailable if there is competent evidence that the child will suffer psychological harm from testifying.”
‘‘[a] due process violation exists only when a claimant is able to establish that he or she was denied a specific procedural protection to which he or she was entitled’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Tayler F.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.