Skip to main content

State v. Poston

Citations

  • 309 Or. App. 377
  • 482 P.3d 778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Oregon’s approach to the doctrine of law of the case is “prudential in nature rather than blind to justice”
  • a “court’s entry of judgment based on nonunanimous jury verdicts * * * [is] plainly erroneous and requires reversal”
  • our conclusion in Herfurth that the defendant did not waive the issue that he challenged in his third appeal by not raising it in an earlier appeal was based on “some of the same prudential concerns that underlie the law of the case doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.