Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/3/2021

State v. Horner

Citations

309 Or. App. 136
481 P.3d 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing our decisions holding that “disproportionality challenges with respect to aggre- gate sentences imposed on convictions for multiple counts are not cognizable under Article I, section 16,” but that the question remains an open one in the Supreme Court
recognizing our decisions holding that “disproportionality challenges with respect to aggregate sentences imposed on convictions for multi- ple counts are not cognizable under Article I, section 16,” but that the question remains an open one in the Supreme Court
reject- ing a constitutional challenge to a 342-month aggregate sen- tence for 26 crimes, because “disproportionality challenges with respect to aggregate sentences imposed on convictions for multiple counts are not cognizable under Article I, sec- tion 16”
reject- ing a constitutional challenge to a 342-month aggregate sen- tence for 26 crimes, because “disproportionality challenges with respect to aggregate sentences imposed on convictions for multiple counts are not cognizable under Article I, sec- tion 16”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, pro tempore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.