Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/4/2006
Poet v. Thompson
Citations
- 144 P.3d 1067
- 208 Or. App. 442
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a trial court’s erroneous reliance on the law of the case doctrine constituted reversible error
- “Whatever the context, as the court explained in [Koch], the application of the doctrine is, ultimately, prudential[.]”
- explaining the policies underlying law of the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Leonard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tien Fu Hsu v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 90×
- Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 18×
- Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-07-26· cited 14×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-12· cited 11×
- Gozzi v. Western Culinary Institute, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-21· cited 8×
- State v. PostonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-18· cited 8×
- International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8 v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-06-22· cited 6×
- Fox v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 2×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-08
- Dept. of Human Services v. M. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.