Skip to main content

Roberson v. Perez

Citations

  • 123 P.3d 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a parent’s voluntarily sending a child away based on fear of investigation is not a placement decision
  • explaining that “[a]n appel- late court’s discretion to disregard the law of the case doctrine is at its apex when there has been a subsequent change in controlling precedent on appeal”
  • rejecting a “constructive placement” argument and holding no harmful placement decision occurred when parents voluntarily sent child to live with grandparents during abuse investigation
  • an “ ‘appellate court may refuse to review any claim of error which was not raised in the trial court.’ ” (quoting RAP 2.5(a))
  • \An appellate court 'may refuse to review any claim of error which was not raised in the trial court.'\
  • we “ ‘may refuse to review any claim of error which was not raised in the trial court’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J.M. Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.