State v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when the defendant does not dispute the terms of our remand, our remand instructions become the \law of the case\
• “Defendant could have made his current argument on direct review * * *. He could have also argued, as he now does, that ORS 138.222(5)(b) required resentencing on his felony convictions as well. He did not, however, make that argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Poston
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-18· cited 8×
• State v. Herfurth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-18· cited 4×
• State v. Silver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 3×
• State v. Galloway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-10
• State v. Ambriz-Arguello
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pratt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 107×
• State v. Bowen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 58×
• State v. Bowen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 3×