Skip to main content

Meredith v. State

Citations

  • 964 So. 2d 247
  • 2007 WL 2609392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant not in custody where, even though police presented defendant with voluminous evidence implicating him in the crime, the impact of the evidence was lessened because they never indicated that they did not believe his explanation
  • holding defendant not in custody where, even though police presented defendant with voluminous evidence implicating him in the crime, the impact of the evidence was lessened because they never indicated that they did not believe his explanation
  • defendant informed that he was not under arrest and that the interview was “strictly voluntary”
  • defendant informed that he was not under arrest and that the interview was \strictly voluntary\
  • “That the interrogation occurred in the inherently coercive environment of the sheriffs office did not transform the otherwise non-custodial interrogation into a custodial one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.