District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/12/2007
Meredith v. State
Citations
- 964 So. 2d 247
- 2007 WL 2609392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding defendant not in custody where, even though police presented defendant with voluminous evidence implicating him in the crime, the impact of the evidence was lessened because they never indicated that they did not believe his explanation
- holding defendant not in custody where, even though police presented defendant with voluminous evidence implicating him in the crime, the impact of the evidence was lessened because they never indicated that they did not believe his explanation
- defendant informed that he was not under arrest and that the interview was “strictly voluntary”
- defendant informed that he was not under arrest and that the interview was \strictly voluntary\
- “That the interrogation occurred in the inherently coercive environment of the sheriffs office did not transform the otherwise non-custodial interrogation into a custodial one.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 34×
- and SC14-826 State of Florida v. Michael Lindsey McAdams and Michael Lindsey McAdams v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-21· cited 9×
- State v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-04· cited 6×
- Anthony v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-25· cited 6×
- ANDRE WILSON, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-04· cited 3×
- D.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12· cited 3×
- DB v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12
- Bowen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-22
- State v. SolomanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-11
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-06· cited 331×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 250×
- Mansfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-03-30· cited 148×
- Roman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 105×
- Schoenwetter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-27· cited 71×
- State v. PittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-04· cited 54×
- State v. PooleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 17×
- Ramsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 15×
- State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-06· cited 9×
- State v. WeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-09· cited 9×
- Wisner v. WisnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.