Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/6/2007
State v. Peterson
Citations
- 2007 VT 24
- 923 A.2d 585
- 181 Vt. 436
- 2007 Vt. 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, under Vermont Constitution, that “[p]hysical evidence gained from statements obtained under circumstances that violate Miranda is inadmissible in criminal proceedings as fruit of the poisonous tree”
- holding, under Vermont Constitution, that “[p]hysi- cal evidence gained from statements obtained under circum- stances that violate Miranda is inadmissible in criminal proceedings as fruit of the poisonous tree”
- declining to follow the approach of Patane under the state constitution, and noting that Patane's approach \create[s] an incentive to violate Miranda\
- physical evidence obtained in violation of Miranda rights must be excluded at trial as \fruit of poisonous tree\
- physical evidence obtained in violation of Miranda rights must be excluded at trial as “fruit of poisonous tree”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. VondehnOregon Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 80×
- State v. MorriseyMontana Supreme Court· 2009-06-09· cited 40×
- State v. SoleSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-02-27· cited 31×
- State v. AmidonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-28· cited 29×
- State v. Brian L. HalversonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2021-01-29· cited 26×
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-04-01· cited 24×
- State v. VondehnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-30· cited 17×
- State v. FleurieSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-09-05· cited 16×
- State v. DelongOregon Supreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 16×
- State v. BarronSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-01-28· cited 13×
- State v. DelaozSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-03-18· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-08-28· cited 10×
- Skjervem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-09-18· cited 8×
- State v. Adam WintersSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-09-04· cited 8×
- Kessler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 4×
- Newell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-04
- Lopez, Roel AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-12-28
- State v. Sendra BeauregardSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2018-12-17
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- United States v. HavensSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 665×
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 619×
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 172×
- United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenNinth Circuit· 1986-09-12· cited 170×
- State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-07-13· cited 152×
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 117×
- State v. OakesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-06· cited 62×
- State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-05-12· cited 44×
- State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-09· cited 17×
- State v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-03-31· cited 12×
- State v. GilmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. AllardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-12-19· cited 8×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-04-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.