Skip to main content
· 2/27/2009

State v. Sole

Citations

  • 2009 VT 24
  • 974 A.2d 587
  • 185 Vt. 504
  • 2009 Vt. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that physical evidence not tainted by prior Miranda violation where the defendant consented to search in response to officer’s request because “a consent request is not designed to elicit an incriminating response” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reiber, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Burgess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.