United States v. Rodolfo Echegoyen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The second entry was ... done to inspect the premises to determine if any public safety hazard [related to a fire or explosive hazard] remained.”
• \The ultimate issue of whether exigent circumstances justify a warrantless entry and/or search is resolved under the de novostandard.\
• \The second entry was . . . done to inspect the premises to determine if any public safety hazard [related to a fire or explosive hazard] remained.\
• defendants responded to a potential fire hazard by turning off the burners, ventilating the premises, and summoning the firefighters to inspect the property
• warrantless entry into home justified when officers smelled an explosive chemical emanating from the defendant’s house
• warrantless entry into home justified when officers smelled an explosive chemical emanating from the defendant's house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).