Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Martin

Citations

  • 444 Mass. 213
  • 827 N.E.2d 198
  • 2005 Mass. LEXIS 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting common-law rule that physical evidence obtained from failure to provide Miranda warnings is presumptively excludable
  • adopting common-law rule that physical evidence obtained from failure to provide Miranda warnings is presumptively excludable
  • declining to follow Patane in light of article 12 of the Massachusetts Constitution because “[i]ts text, its history, and [the court’s] prior interpretations conclusively establish that it provides greater rights than those enumerated in the Federal Constitution”
  • physical evidence derived from unwarned statements presumptively excludable from evidence as “fruit” of improper failure to provide such warnings
  • physical evidence derived from unwarned statements presumptively excludable from evidence as \fruit\ of improper failure to provide such warnings
  • Miranda protects rights guaranteed under both Fifth Amendment and art. 12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cordy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.