Skip to main content

State v. Percy

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1876

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences fines indigent ability to pay forfeiture bill of particulars prompt notice. Trial court failed to make findings required for the imposition of consecutive sentences. Imposition of fines were affirmed where court considered indigent defendant's present and future ability to pay. Trial court erred in granting forfeiture of property where state did not attach a forfeiture specification to charging instrument and failed to give the defendant prompt notice of its intent to seek forfeiture of property as required by R.C. 2981.04(A).

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.