Skip to main content

State v. Peters

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4461

Syllabus

Fines R.C. 2929.19 indigent plain error R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court did not commit plain error in imposing the fines as part of Peters's sentence. Peters's assignment of error contesting his consecutive sentences is moot because he was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for his conviction for aggravated murder, which he does not challenge on appeal. Even if his assignment of error contesting consecutive sentences was not moot, the trial court did not err because the record shows that the trial court made the requisite findings with respect to consecutive sentences at the sentencing hearing and incorporated those findings in its journal entry.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.