Cleveland v. Tarulli
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3462
Syllabus
Selective diversion program SIP completion of program R.C. 2981.04, R.C. 2981.02 forfeiture strictly construed failure to comply with statutory requirements forfeiture specification proper notice. Because forfeiture was not a term of defendant's participation in the court's SIP, the trial court erred in denying in part defendant's motion for return of his firearm because the city failed to comply with the statutory requirement to provide notice of the forfeiture claim.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-05-24· cited 4,737×
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court· 1982-04-28· cited 113×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-17· cited 20×
- State v. NorthOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-09· cited 14×
- State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-03· cited 14×
- State v. FortOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-07· cited 12×
- State v. PercyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-03· cited 7×
- State v. LeetOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-16· cited 6×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.