State v. Watson
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 831
Syllabus
Crim.R. 43(A)(1); consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.41; R.C. 2929.14; courses of conduct. Appellant contested term of imprisonment arising from guilty plea. Case remanded for resentencing where court failed to sentence appellant for one of the charged offenses at hearing, attempting to do so only in a subsequent sentencing entry, in violation of Crim.R. 43(A)(1). Court also erred in announcing at hearing that it was running all prison terms consecutively, violating R.C. 2929.41 where appellant's convictions included both felonies and misdemeanors. Court also failed to make a complete \courses of conduct\ finding at hearing under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(b) to support its imposition of consecutive sentences. On remand, court instructed to make consecutive-sentencing findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.41 and 2929.14, as merited by the record.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Polus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-02-25· cited 44×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2024-03-27· cited 30×
- State v. VaughnOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-09· cited 18×
- State v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-28· cited 13×
- State v. McKinneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-28· cited 9×
- State v. PercyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-03· cited 7×
- State v. VanscoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-13· cited 5×
- State v. StroudOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.