Ohio Supreme Court· 9/8/1999

State v. Edmonson

Citations

86 Ohio St. 3d 324
715 N.E.2d 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a trial court must support its findings with reasons before imposing a sentence that departs from the minimum
indicating that a record must reflect that the trial court considered all requisite factors before sentencing an offender
stating that the findings and reasons may be reflected in the record from the sentencing hearing or the judgment entry and reversing because although there existed some reasons that may support a finding, the court made no findings
remanding case for resentencing where the trial court imposed a sentence without specifying any of the requisite findings and reasons in the sentencing statute
R.C. 2929.19 [B] [2] calls for court to provide an explanation to support its findings
where the Ohio Supreme Court evaluated the validity of a maximum sentence based on the contents of both the transcript and the journal entry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

190 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Edmonson

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.