State v. Percy
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 664
Syllabus
Resentencing hearing limited remand R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) statutory findings court not required to provide reasons or support for findings. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences at appellant's resentencing hearing. The court made the required statutory findings for the imposition of consecutive sentences, and it was not required to provide any reasons or support thereof.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PetersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-01· cited 8×
- State v. AkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-18· cited 5×
- State v. SumlinOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-20· cited 4×
- State v. ContesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-03· cited 3×
- State v. HaynesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-22· cited 1×
- State v. DiggsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-15
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-17
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. ShelineOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 86×
- State v. FrostOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-19· cited 9×
- State v. McKinneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-28· cited 9×
- State v. PercyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-03· cited 7×
- State v. SaxonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-02· cited 6×
- State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.