State v. Terrell
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 652
Syllabus
Abuse of discretion; present and future ability to pay. Trial court abused its discretion in imposing a total of $40,000 in fines when it relied on a year-old post-sentence-investigation report that reported the appellant had two jobs and was financially comfortable when at the time of sentencing the appellant had spent the last year in jail under a $100,000 bond. Further, the trial court abused its discretion when it determined that appellant had the future ability to pay based primarily on his potential to earn disregarding his lengthy prison term and status as a convicted felon with serious felony convictions.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. Beasley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 133×
- State v. SekicOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-11· cited 26×
- State v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19· cited 17×
- State v. PetticrewOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-20· cited 13×
- State v. MosbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-31· cited 13×
- State v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-16· cited 11×
- State v. CottoOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-21· cited 10×
- State v. PercyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-03· cited 7×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-15· cited 4×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-01· cited 1×
- State v. ZsigrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-22· cited 1×
- State v. KyleOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.