Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/2/1996

State v. Patterson

Citations

236 Conn. 561
674 A.2d 416
1996 Conn. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, despite statute and rule of practice directing trial courts to prepare presentence report, no due process right to such report
applying Mathews test to conclude that there is no federal due process right to presentence investigation report
applying Mathews test and concluding that criminal defendant's federal constitutional right to procedural due process at sentencing does not include right to presentence investigation report
applying Mathews test and concluding that criminal defendant’s federal constitutional right to procedural due process at sentencing does not include right to presentence investigation report
applying Mathews test to conclude that there is no federal due process right to presentence investigation report
granting motion by criminal defense lawyers association to appear as amicus curiae and to file brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Norcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.