Skip to main content
· 2/13/2003

People v. Salyer

Citations

  • 80 P.3d 831
  • 2003 Colo. App. LEXIS 194
  • 2003 WL 297534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a judge’s absence from the courtroom when the defendant’s video-recorded statements were played for the jury was non-structural constitutional error
  • discussing that no objections were made related to the videotapes’ being played and that the court “did not delegate to others the authority to exercise any judicial function, such as entering judgment, issuing rulings, or presiding over argument”
  • particular argument on appeal that the district court erred in denying motion to suppress was waived where the defendant did not raise that argument in the district court
  • judge absent during videotape testimony and when court adjourned for day
  • judge absent during videotape testimony and when court adjourned for day
  • argument on appeal that the district court erred in denying motion to suppress on voluntariness grounds was waived where the defendant did not raise that argument in the district court but raised other suppression arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dailey, Kapelke, Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.