Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/26/1994

State v. Patterson

Citations

230 Conn. 385
645 A.2d 535
1994 Conn. LEXIS 228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that trial judge must be present for voir dire proceedings in all future criminal cases even though defendant in that case had waived that right
concluding that trial judge must be present for voir dire proceedings in all future criminal cases even though defendant in that case had waived that right
holding that criminal defendant can waive right to have judge present during voir dire as required by Practice Book § 848, now § 42-12
holding that criminal defendant implicitly waived right to have trial judge present during voir dire by acquiescing when judge left courtroom and by asking judge to return only when judicial determinations needed
holding that criminal defendant implicitly waived right to have trial judge present during voir dire by acquiescing when judge left courtroom and by asking judge to return only when judicial determinations needed
prescribing rule, consistent with rules of practice, requiring trial judge to be present during voir dire in criminal cases but imposing further limitation not addressed in rule that neither party can waive this requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.