State v. O'MEARA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court’s decision as to whether multiple offenses were committed as part of a single behavioral incident for the purpose of section 609.035 entails factual determinations that will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lindsey
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-09-02· cited 34×
• State v. Cogger
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-08-08· cited 3×
• State of Minnesota v. Steve Vang
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-04-15

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Griller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 451×
• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. Amos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-27· cited 188×
• State v. McCoy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-01· cited 98×
• State v. Cross
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-04-23· cited 66×
• State v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 45×
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-09-13· cited 43×
• State v. Wakefield
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-16· cited 30×
• State v. Soto
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-04-24· cited 25×
• State v. Schmidt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-06-22· cited 22×
• State v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-06-03· cited 14×
• State v. Heath
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-08-10· cited 14×
• State v. Meldrum
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-11-28· cited 13×
• Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-07-18· cited 13×
• State v. Richardson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-02· cited 6×
• State v. Nordby
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-12-12· cited 5×