State v. Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no unity of time when the conduct was broken and sporadic over a period of four years
• stating “[t]he determination of whether multiple offenses constitute a single behavioral act is not, however, a mechanical test, but requires an examination of all the facts and circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. O'MEARA
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-08-26· cited 11×
• State v. Dick
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-02-05· cited 9×
• State v. Suhon
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-04· cited 7×
• Dugan v. Sorensen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2025-06-27· cited 6×
• State v. Franks
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-04· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Olson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-11· cited 141×
• State v. Kuhnau
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-03-01· cited 128×
• State v. Worthy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-20· cited 109×
• State v. Flores
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-15· cited 92×
• State v. Cross
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-04-23· cited 66×
• State v. Bookwalter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-08· cited 63×
• State v. Soto
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-04-24· cited 25×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-10-20· cited 25×
• State v. Schmidt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-06-22· cited 22×
• State v. Hare
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-03-05· cited 19×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-03-02· cited 15×
• State v. Azure
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-25· cited 14×
• State v. Hanson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-02· cited 14×
• State v. Schmitz
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-01-28· cited 10×