State of Minnesota v. Steve Vang
Syllabus
Appellant's trial included testimony that appellant pointed a gun at his former girlfriend in a grocery-store parking lot. In this direct appeal, appellant challenges two of his four convictions stemming from that incident, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions for second-degree assault and unlawful possession of a firearm and that the district court abused its discretion by admitting relationship evidence. Appellant relies heavily on a surveillance video recording of the incident. We conclude that the record evidence is sufficient to prove that appellant had a gun during the incident. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted relationship evidence about appellant and his former girlfriend. Thus, we affirm.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.