Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/24/1997
State v. Soto
Citations
- 562 N.W.2d 299
- 1997 Minn. LEXIS 288
- 1997 WL 197510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that whether multiple offenses are part of a single behavioral act involves an examination of all the facts
- court declined to adopt doctrines of sentencing entrapment and sentencing manipulation in absence of egregious police conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tomljanovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-09-03· cited 53×
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-03-21· cited 37×
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy John BakkenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-03· cited 26×
- State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-12-29· cited 16×
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-08-10· cited 14×
- State v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-22· cited 13×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-11-26· cited 11×
- State v. O'MEARACourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-08-26· cited 11×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-11-07· cited 10×
- State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-02-23· cited 7×
- State v. SuhonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-04· cited 7×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-02· cited 6×
- State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-11-30· cited 5×
- State v. CoggerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-08-08· cited 3×
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-02-15· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Matthew Rueben MonacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-22
- State v. WebbIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-02-27
- Karl Alfredo Rosillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2025-10-06
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Michael Floyd Barth, Appellee/cross-AppellantEighth Circuit· 1993-05-25· cited 94×
- United States v. Donald K. ShephardEighth Circuit· 1993-11-04· cited 83×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-26· cited 78×
- United States v. Randall Rogers, United States of America v. Scott J. PhilippEighth Circuit· 1993-02-15· cited 77×
- United States v. Mikkel H. StavigEighth Circuit· 1996-04-10· cited 58×
- United States v. Joseph Franklin CalvaEighth Circuit· 1992-10-29· cited 56×
- State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-04-11· cited 38×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-02· cited 37×
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-01-21· cited 31×
- State v. NorregaardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-04· cited 30×
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-01· cited 27×
- State v. ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-11· cited 16×
- State v. HartfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-31· cited 11×
- State v. LitzingerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-10-24· cited 5×
- State v. PittelSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.