Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/20/2019

State v. Jones

Citations

439 P.3d 485
296 Or. App. 553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to reach that question because any error in admitting the chal- lenged statements was harmless
declining to reach that question because any error in admitting the challenged statements was harmless
“It is defendant’s burden, as the party seek- ing reversal based on a claim of evidentiary error, to show some likelihood that the challenged evidence affected the verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
“[T]he ‘reasonableness’ question when it comes to a self- defense claim is whether the circumstances as known to the defendant would lead a reasonable person who experiences those same circumstances to perceive the use of force to be necessary.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Hadlock, Powers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.