Skip to main content
· 4/24/1998

Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.

Citations

  • 957 P.2d 147
  • 327 Or. 99
  • 1998 Ore. LEXIS 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “incidental carelessness . . . is not an appropriate defense to [a] plaintiff’s products liability action”
  • “Regarding a trial court’s refusal to give a requested jury instruction, * * * there is no error if the requested instruction is not correct in all respects.”
  • failure to give requested instruction not error unless requested instruction is correct in all respects
  • trial court does not err in refusing to give requested instruction that is not correct in all respects
  • “[W]e first inquire whether the requested jury instruction is a correct statement of the law.”
  • “there is no error [in refusing to give a proposed instruction] if the requested instruction is not correct in all respects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Kulongoski, Goski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.