Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/20/2014

State v. Gray

Citations

261 Or. App. 121
322 P.3d 1094
2014 WL 662233
2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a jury instruction incorrectly stated the law because it omitted elements of the charged crime and that the error was plain
concluding that trial court’s instruction that omitted elements of the charged crime was plain error because it was an incorrect statement of the law
concluding that trial court plainly erred in failing to merge guilty verdicts on first-degree rape and second-degree sexual abuse
holding that a jury instruction incorrectly stated the law because it omitted elements of the charged crime and that the error was plain
holding that a jury instruction incorrectly stated the law because it omitted elements of the charged crime and that the error was plain
concluding that gravity of error compelled exercise of discretion to correct plain instructional error, because the trial court’s failure to instruct jury as to culpable mental state was not harmless, and the defendant’s challenged con- victions included “serious felonies” of first-degree rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Haselton, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.