State v. Yen Lin Wan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determination as to whether a jury instruction was complete depended on the law and the facts of the case
• “A party is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law that supports that party’s theory of the case when (1) there is evidence to support that theory and (2) the requested instruction is a correct statement of the law.” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Harryman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 19×
• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
• State v. Moreno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-02· cited 5×
• State v. Lorenzo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 4×
• State v. Strye
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 4×
• State v. Harrison
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-06· cited 3×
• State v. Cossette
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-15· cited 3×
• State v. Eastep
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-20· cited 3×
• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Baker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-01· cited 69×
• State v. Oliphant
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 42×
• State v. Wright
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 22×
• State v. Branch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 17×
• State v. Salisbury
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-05· cited 8×
• State v. Dahrens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 6×
• State v. Wilhelm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-12-14· cited 4×