West Virginia Supreme Court· 7/1/1988

State v. Neuman

Citations

371 S.E.2d 77
179 W. Va. 580
1988 W. Va. LEXIS 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the specific requirements of these procedural safeguards shall be applied prospectively in cases other than the one before us”
holding that \the specific requirements of these procedural safeguards shall be applied prospectively in cases other than the one before us\
holding that “procedural safeguards must be employed on the record to insure that the defendant’s waiver of the right to testify was made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently”
holding that the decision to testify is so fundamental that procedural safeguards must be employed on the record to insure that defendant’s waiver was made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently
adopting the reasoning and procedures outlined by the Colorado Supreme Court in Curtis, supra
trial court must advise defendant of his right to testify and ascertain whether waiver is voluntary, knowing and intentional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGRAW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Neuman

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.