State Ex Rel. Dunlap v. Berger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitration agreement which prohibited punitive damages was unenforceable as against public policy
• holding prohibitions on punitive damages and class action relief that would be the result of the application of a purchase and finance agreement are clearly unconscionable
• holding prohibitions on punitive damages and class action relief that would be the result of the application of a purchase and finance agreement are clearly unconscionable
• stating that “‘a rule automatically invalidating adhesion contracts would be completely unworkable’”
• acknowledging \complex issues of federalism” and stating that \we ... give no weight to Mr. Dunlap’s state constitutional rights to a jury trial in the public court system’’
• prohibitions on punitive damages and class action relief in arbitration agreement rendered application of agreement unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).