State v. Neuman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a constitutional issue was preserved for appellate review despite the defendant using different language in the argument at trial because the trial court's ruling indicated it understood and ruled on the constitutional issue
• “One to whose conduct the law clearly applies does not have standing to challenge it for vagueness.” (quoting Curtis v. State, 345 S.C. 557, 572, 549 S.E.2d 591, 598 (2001))
• \'One to whose conduct the law clearly applies does not have standing to challenge it for vagueness.'\ (quoting Curtis v. State, 345 S.C. 557, 572, 549 S.E.2d 591, 598 (2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bodman v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-08· cited 16×
• South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-06-12· cited 10×
• Town of Mount Pleasant v. Chimento
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-11-21· cited 7×
• SCHuman Affairs Commission v. Yang
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-07-22
• Weaver v. Recreation District
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-09-02
• Town of Sullivan's Island v. Murray
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-09-01
• Jimmy A. Richardson, II, Solicitor for the 15th Judicial Circuit v. Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-One, U.S. Currency and Travis Green
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-09-14
• Freddie Eugene Owens v. Bryan P. Stirling
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2024-07-31
• Meredith Logan Whitehurst v. Town of Sullivan's Island
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2025-07-16

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Curtis v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-17· cited 152×
• In Re the Treatment & Care of Luckabaugh
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-07-22· cited 110×
• Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-10-14· cited 91×
• State v. Nelson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-06· cited 55×
• State v. Curtis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-05· cited 54×
• Kurschner v. City of Camden Planning Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-01-14· cited 42×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-07-21· cited 41×
• Jenkins v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-01-23· cited 25×
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Basnight
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-28· cited 25×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-21· cited 22×
• Guinyard v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-03-14· cited 18×
• Ingle v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-08· cited 17×
• State v. Greene
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-03-29· cited 17×
• In Re Amir X.S.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-11-06· cited 17×
• State v. Bouye
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-02-18· cited 16×
• State v. Houey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-09-10· cited 16×
• State v. Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-03-15· cited 14×
• State v. East
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 10×
• State v. Michau
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 8×
• Rainey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 6×