Call v. McKenzie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] criminal defendant can knowingly and intelligently waive his constitutional rights . . . when such knowing and intelligent waiver is conclusively demonstrated on the record”
• holding that “[a] criminal defendant can knowingly and intelligently waive his constitutional rights . . . when such knowing and intelligent waiver is conclusively demonstrated on the record”
• holding that “[a] criminal defendant can knowingly and intelligently waive his constitutional rights . . . when such knowing and intelligent waiver is conclusively demonstrated on the record”
• noting that the petitioner there sought a copy of the record of the underlying criminal proceeding to prepare a habeas petition
• finding that, though a criminal defendant is entitled to due process of law, “he is not entitled to appeal upon appeal, attack upon attack, and habeas corpus upon habeas corpus”
• identifying specific questions trial judge should ask defendant to determine if guilty plea is knowing, intelligent and voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).