State v. Rimmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a criminal defendant does not have “to acknowledge his awareness of a limited cross-examination rule” if he chooses to testify to collateral mitigating factors in a capital sentencing hearing
• first citing State v. Odom, 137 S.W.3d 572, 589 (Tenn. 2004); and then State v. Russell, 10 S.W.3d 270, 275 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).