James Brown v. Christopher Artuz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that \what objections should be raised\ is a matter \primarily involv[ing] trial strategy and tactics\
• seeing no need to remand for findings as to counsel’s performance, given that “Brown cannot satisfy the prejudice prong of the Strickland test”
• declining to determine whether a “conclusory allegation” that a defendant was prevented from testifying raised an issue of fact where defendant could not demon strate prejudice
• declining to address the first prong of Strickland on the ground that the defendant could not satisfy the prejudice prong
• declining to address the first prong of Strickland on the ground that the defendant could not satisfy the prejudice prong
• declining to address the first prong of Strickland on the ground that the defendant could not satisfy the prejudice prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).