Second Circuit· 8/6/1997

James Brown v. Christopher Artuz

Citations

124 F.3d 73
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9143
96 Daily Journal DAR 15129
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that \what objections should be raised\ is a matter \primarily involv[ing] trial strategy and tactics\
seeing no need to remand for findings as to counsel’s performance, given that “Brown cannot satisfy the prejudice prong of the Strickland test”
declining to determine whether a “conclusory allegation” that a defendant was prevented from testifying raised an issue of fact where defendant could not demon strate prejudice
declining to address the first prong of Strickland on the ground that the defendant could not satisfy the prejudice prong
declining to address the first prong of Strickland on the ground that the defendant could not satisfy the prejudice prong
declining to address the first prong of Strickland on the ground that the defendant could not satisfy the prejudice prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Newman, Cedarbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.