Nebraska Supreme Court· 12/7/2001
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 636 N.W.2d 620
- 262 Neb. 896
- 2001 Neb. LEXIS 187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that state and federal double jeopardy provisions do not prohibit habitual criminal enhancement on remand from appellate court
- rejecting the argument that the Nebraska Constitution affords greater protection than its federal counterpart and applying \the rationale of Monge\ to the state's habitual criminal enhancement proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, Miller-Lerman, McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 379×
- State v. OldsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-06-10· cited 378×
- State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-08-22· cited 365×
- State v. KeupNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-01-10· cited 128×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 121×
- State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-01-07· cited 106×
- State v. HallNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-05-28· cited 93×
- People v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-05-26· cited 77×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-01-15· cited 65×
- State v. SimnickNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-03-05· cited 53×
- State v. WinklerNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-06-20· cited 40×
- State v. SolomonNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-01-29· cited 28×
- State v. VannNebraska Supreme Court· 2020-06-12· cited 24×
- State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-12-21· cited 15×
- State v. MinerNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-04-18· cited 13×
- State v. TymaNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-10-04· cited 12×
- State v. McKayNebraska Court of Appeals· 2006-03-28· cited 10×
- State v. ValdezNebraska Supreme Court· 2020-04-03· cited 6×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-10-26· cited 5×
- State v. RodriguezNebraska Court of Appeals· 2003-05-13· cited 4×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 610×
- State v. TrotterNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 149×
- Long v. HackerNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-08-05· cited 102×
- State v. OrdunaNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 87×
- State v. McCrackenNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-08-18· cited 87×
- State v. FrancoNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-05-28· cited 76×
- State v. RistauNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-28· cited 73×
- Hunter v. MorseNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-12-01· cited 73×
- State v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-04-11· cited 72×
- State v. HochsteinNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-08-03· cited 55×
- State v. GutierrezNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-01-05· cited 48×
- Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-01-10· cited 47×
- State v. CastorNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-08-10· cited 39×
- Jolly v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-04-18· cited 37×
- Humphrey v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-07-23· cited 31×
- State v. FowlerNebraska Supreme Court· 1978-11-08· cited 26×
- State v. NeissNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 21×
- State v. McGheeNebraska Supreme Court· 1969-05-02· cited 20×
- State v. IshamNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 18×
- State v. GrayNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-02-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.